On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:43:11 -0700, Remysun wrote:
> On Jul 27, 11:10 pm, Wingnut wrote:
>
> \> since I was poking fun at Ebert, not at MC, and this really
>> *should* have been obvious to everyone, particularly as I named Ebert
>> explicitly in my post.
>
> And I'm sure Ebert didn't ask for your opinion either, having a hard
> enough time swallowing before your bullshit reply.
I do note a distinctive odor of bullshit in this thread of late, but I am
quite sure it's coming from your corner.
>> > and if you can't get your facts right
>>
>> Fortunately that will not be a problem.
>
> If you can't even figure out what the hell happened to Jeopardy, I have
> little hope for the rest of your "knowledge".
I don't watch Jeopardy, so I wouldn't know whether anything had happened
to it, but I don't agree that that makes me stupid and/or ignorant -- it
just makes me not a Jeopardy fan, and I don't think the two are remotely
equivalent.
Feel free to disagree, so long as you agree to disagree and don't try to
force your opinion on me or others.
On the other hand, your remark implies that something happened to
Jeopardy. I confess to being mildly curious now, despite not being a fan.
Did someone win a million bucks, or the network cancel the show, or
Trebek retire or die, or something? I heard that the long-time host of
The Price Is Right (another show I don't watch) retired recently...but I
don't recall stumbling upon any gossip about Jeopardy or Trebek.
>> > maybe this isn't the right forum for you.
>
>> I find that in my experience thus far there is a nearly 100%
>> correlation between someone saying something like that and it applying
>> to the one who said it.
>
> I have found an absolute correlation between delusional wignuts who post
> their flawed facts and arguments, and the amount of flaming fun I have.
That might be because you are a delusional wingnut and you have fun
trolling newsgroups with flawed arguments? :-)
> So hey, Wiggy? Maybe when someone else (not one of your socks)
I don't use socks. Even you don't use socks. That's the province of
really scummy trolls like WQ, Troy, and Seamus.
> validates your credibility, I'll treat you seriously. Otherwise,
Otherwise, the socially appropriate and citizenly thing to do is keep
your peace -- killfiling me if you'd otherwise feel a nearly irresistible
compulsion to post kneejerk flames whenever I said something you
disagreed with. As should be apparent from the contents of the
news.answers.newusers FAQ everyone posting to newsgroups should have at
least skimmed once. |
