On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:11:15 -0500, Brian wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 11:14:30 -0500, "Aruba Badding Sr."
> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 07:23:49 -0800 (PST), wolfagain wrote:
>>> My neighbor told me that her family had to witness several males
>>> walking around in thongs, holding hands, and 2 were wearing lipstick
>>
>>And what, exactly, is wrong with that?
>>
>>Actually, I have a bit of a theory. It seems there's a kind of society-wide
>>neurosis in the West, such that whereas female .uality is regarded as
>>alluring, male .uality is regarded as threatening.
>>
>>Hence the attraction to ...s -- twice the allure -- and hatred for male
>>homo.uality -- twice the threat.
>>
>>But why is male .uality demonized these days? Just a pendulum swing? It
>>wasn't that long ago that it was female .uality that was demonized,
>>during the time of the witch-hunts.
>>
>>Whatever. Someone stop the damn thing and leave it hanging straight down
>>the center, please.
>
> It's not appropriate for what is supposed to be a family oriented
> location. On men or women. Straight or ....
wolfagain never did say in which of the theme parks the thongs at issue
were worn. Perhaps it was Typhoon Lagoon or Blizzard Beach.
--
Copyright 07/03/2010 10:18:08 PM Aruba Badding Sr.
All your base are belong to us. |