On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:03:19 GMT, Big J wrote:
>2nz wrote in
>news:a5b5262b-a28e-4844-b3df-4baf1919099b@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com:
>
>> On Nov 9, 5:01 pm, scorpio...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>> On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 12:36:00 -0800 (PST), 2nz
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >On Nov 9, 12:22 pm, scorpio...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>> >> On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 14:40:30 GMT, Big J
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >Island Girly wrote in
>>> >> >news:Xns9B5154F0C8A38boo.inghoo@194.177.96.78:
>>>
>>> >> >> Font of All Important Info
>>> >> >>news:2ggch4d2orad5hkqe8evral8de0rftcpp1@4ax.com:in
>>> >> >> alt.gossip.celebrities
>>>
>>> >> >>> there definitely seems to be a large schism in the Republican
>>> >> >>> part
>> y
>>> >> >>> between the fundies and the moderates. i am definitely
>>> >> >>> surprised--and delighted!--that Fox News seems to be taking
>>> >> >>> the anti-fundie side.
>>>
>>> >> >> Like you, I am very surprised by Faux News reporting. There
>>> >> >> has
>> got
>>> >> >> to be a motivation for it. As someone else pointed out, I'm
>>> >> >> gues
>> sing
>>> >> >> it is to try and dissuade Ms. Palin for running in 2012. Quite
>>> >> >> frankly, the odds of her even getting a nomination in 2012 are
>>> >> >> quit
>> e
>>> >> >> slim. 2016? Again that is doubtful but much of that will depe
>> nd on
>>> >> >> what happens from here on.
>>>
>>> >> >> So far it is not looking so good for Palin's political career
>>> >> >> but ya'never know.
>>>
>>> >> >> What surprises me is that it's the Republicans that are doing
>>> >> >> the smearing. One would think it would be the Dems that would
>>> >> >> try to destroy her and keep her from 2012. They don't need
>>> >> >> to... not ye
>> t.
>>>
>>> >> >Perhaps it's a more moderate group from w/in the Repubs that
>>> >> >wants to ensure that Palin's more radical right/religous right
>>> >> >wing doesn't ge
>> t
>>> >> >into party leadership.
>>>
>>> >> >Fromhttp://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=6130769&page
>> =1
>>> >> >(this was written before the election!)
>>>
>>> >> >For the past 40 years, the GOP's success has come from a broad
>>> >> >coalit
>> ion
>>> >> >of conservatives. Evangelical Christians who have pushed a
>>> >> >pro-life, values-based agenda have made strange but powerful
>>> >> >bedfellows of libertarians and fiscal conservatives who want
>>> >> >small government and a laissez-faire approach to their lives and
>>> >> >finances. Isolationists who
>> do
>>> >> >not support U.S. intervention in foreign affairs have supported
>>> >> >and v
>> oted
>>> >> >for the same candidates backed by neo-conservatives who believe
>>> >> >the U
>> .S.
>>> >> >has the right to extend its power anywhere in the world.
>>>
>>> >> >That coalition, which experts say has been fraying for years,
>>> >> >could ultimately be undone by this election. Each faction
>>> >> >believes it represents the soul of the party and each is
>>> >> >jockeying to become the
>> base
>>> >> >on which the party's new incarnation should be built.
>>>
>>> >> >"The Republican Party and the conservative coalition is an
>>> >> >unstable compound that has been coming apart for several years,"
>>> >> >Smith said. "
>> The
>>> >> >immigration debate illustrated that dramatically and the
>>> >> >infighting around the Wall Street bailout even more so. Pat
>>> >> >Buchanan isolationis
>> t
>>> >> >Republicans have little in common with Wall Street Republicans,
>>> >> >and libertarian Republicans have little in common with the
>>> >> >religious righ
>> t."
>>>
>>> >> >"The party will have to decide which of those strains will revive
>>> >> >the party and lead it into the future." he said.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >"McCain will be held responsible for losing this election, but he
>>> >> >can
>> 't
>>> >> >be fully blamed for what is happening inside the party," said Ed
>>> >> >Roll
>> ins,
>>> >> >a Republican strategist who chaired Gov. Mike Huckabee's primary
>>> >> >campaign. "Both Bushes are somewhat responsible. Nixon made an
>>> >> >effort
>> to
>>> >> >shift Democrats to Republicans and Reagan turned on a new
>>> >> >generation
>> of
>>> >> >young conservatives who came of age during his presidency. The
>>> >> >party
>> has
>>> >> >stopped that outreach in recent years, young voters are turned
>>> >> >off."
>>>
>>> >> >Big J
>>>
>>> >> >-----
>>>
>>> >> Well, well! I see you guys are still at it. You just cannot help
>>> >> yourselves, can you? LOL How pathetic.
>>>
>>> >What's pathetic about pointing out that someone who wants to be a
>>> >leader of the USA doesn't have a clue about elementary geography?
>>> >She thinks Times Square is an algebra problem.
>>>
>>> Because, as liberals do, you take something that is not proven or
>>> verified and treat it as truth. Nobody knows who is claiming this
>>> actually happened or in what context so basically, you are being
>>> another liberal.
>>
>> Read my original post again. It is a QUOTE from Palin, with a link.
>> She is still confused about Africa.
>> You can spin all you like but she's still a dolt.
>
>I had to plonk this poster - is it trying to be a troll? All blather and
>no fact. Unable to support any claims orertions. Not worthy of
>dealing with, IMO.
>
>Big J
>
>-----
Big J, you are so two faced. I pounded yourertions before the
election with so many facts that you abandoned the posts you made. You
are just like most far left liberals....If someone does not agree with
you then you shut them off or try to find a way to shut them up.
Go ahead and spew some more of your Christian sayings while at the
same time you are rude and talk about others in a non-Christian way.
What a hypocrite! |
