Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 18:22:56 -0500, strabo wrote:
>
>> clouddreamer wrote:
>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>> Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 05:52:30 +0000, Californians With Common Sense
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Proposition 8 is irrelevant. No law trumps the 14th Amendment.
>>>> No one suggests it does. The Equal Protection clause is not being
>>>> violated. The state may set the rules for, and define, marriage. As
>>>> long as those rules apply equally to everyone, regardless of any
>>>> self-imagined membership in some class, no equal protection violation
>>>> occurs.
>>> But those rules do not apply equally to everyone. People are being
>>> excluded.
>>>
>>>
>> There are males and there are females. Both are treated equally under the
>> law.
>
> No, they aren't for all the reasons
Yes, they are. Your "reasons" are no such thing. |
