2nz wrote in
news:a5b5262b-a28e-4844-b3df-4baf1919099b@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com:
> On Nov 9, 5:01 pm, scorpio...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 12:36:00 -0800 (PST), 2nz
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Nov 9, 12:22 pm, scorpio...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 14:40:30 GMT, Big J
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >Island Girly wrote in
>> >> >news:Xns9B5154F0C8A38boo.inghoo@194.177.96.78:
>>
>> >> >> Font of All Important Info
>> >> >>news:2ggch4d2orad5hkqe8evral8de0rftcpp1@4ax.com:in
>> >> >> alt.gossip.celebrities
>>
>> >> >>> there definitely seems to be a large schism in the Republican
>> >> >>> part
> y
>> >> >>> between the fundies and the moderates. i am definitely
>> >> >>> surprised--and delighted!--that Fox News seems to be taking
>> >> >>> the anti-fundie side.
>>
>> >> >> Like you, I am very surprised by Faux News reporting. There
>> >> >> has
> got
>> >> >> to be a motivation for it. As someone else pointed out, I'm
>> >> >> gues
> sing
>> >> >> it is to try and dissuade Ms. Palin for running in 2012. Quite
>> >> >> frankly, the odds of her even getting a nomination in 2012 are
>> >> >> quit
> e
>> >> >> slim. 2016? Again that is doubtful but much of that will depe
> nd on
>> >> >> what happens from here on.
>>
>> >> >> So far it is not looking so good for Palin's political career
>> >> >> but ya'never know.
>>
>> >> >> What surprises me is that it's the Republicans that are doing
>> >> >> the smearing. One would think it would be the Dems that would
>> >> >> try to destroy her and keep her from 2012. They don't need
>> >> >> to... not ye
> t.
>>
>> >> >Perhaps it's a more moderate group from w/in the Repubs that
>> >> >wants to ensure that Palin's more radical right/religous right
>> >> >wing doesn't ge
> t
>> >> >into party leadership.
>>
>> >> >Fromhttp://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=6130769&page
> =1
>> >> >(this was written before the election!)
>>
>> >> >For the past 40 years, the GOP's success has come from a broad
>> >> >coalit
> ion
>> >> >of conservatives. Evangelical Christians who have pushed a
>> >> >pro-life, values-based agenda have made strange but powerful
>> >> >bedfellows of libertarians and fiscal conservatives who want
>> >> >small government and a laissez-faire approach to their lives and
>> >> >finances. Isolationists who
> do
>> >> >not support U.S. intervention in foreign affairs have supported
>> >> >and v
> oted
>> >> >for the same candidates backed by neo-conservatives who believe
>> >> >the U
> .S.
>> >> >has the right to extend its power anywhere in the world.
>>
>> >> >That coalition, which experts say has been fraying for years,
>> >> >could ultimately be undone by this election. Each faction
>> >> >believes it represents the soul of the party and each is
>> >> >jockeying to become the
> base
>> >> >on which the party's new incarnation should be built.
>>
>> >> >"The Republican Party and the conservative coalition is an
>> >> >unstable compound that has been coming apart for several years,"
>> >> >Smith said. "
> The
>> >> >immigration debate illustrated that dramatically and the
>> >> >infighting around the Wall Street bailout even more so. Pat
>> >> >Buchanan isolationis
> t
>> >> >Republicans have little in common with Wall Street Republicans,
>> >> >and libertarian Republicans have little in common with the
>> >> >religious righ
> t."
>>
>> >> >"The party will have to decide which of those strains will revive
>> >> >the party and lead it into the future." he said.
>> >> >
>> >> >"McCain will be held responsible for losing this election, but he
>> >> >can
> 't
>> >> >be fully blamed for what is happening inside the party," said Ed
>> >> >Roll
> ins,
>> >> >a Republican strategist who chaired Gov. Mike Huckabee's primary
>> >> >campaign. "Both Bushes are somewhat responsible. Nixon made an
>> >> >effort
> to
>> >> >shift Democrats to Republicans and Reagan turned on a new
>> >> >generation
> of
>> >> >young conservatives who came of age during his presidency. The
>> >> >party
> has
>> >> >stopped that outreach in recent years, young voters are turned
>> >> >off."
>>
>> >> >Big J
>>
>> >> >-----
>>
>> >> Well, well! I see you guys are still at it. You just cannot help
>> >> yourselves, can you? LOL How pathetic.
>>
>> >What's pathetic about pointing out that someone who wants to be a
>> >leader of the USA doesn't have a clue about elementary geography?
>> >She thinks Times Square is an algebra problem.
>>
>> Because, as liberals do, you take something that is not proven or
>> verified and treat it as truth. Nobody knows who is claiming this
>> actually happened or in what context so basically, you are being
>> another liberal.
>
> Read my original post again. It is a QUOTE from Palin, with a link.
> She is still confused about Africa.
> You can spin all you like but she's still a dolt.
I had to plonk this poster - is it trying to be a troll? All blather and
no fact. Unable to support any claims orertions. Not worthy of
dealing with, IMO.
Big J
-----
--
Posted Via Newsfeeds.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Service
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.Newsfeeds.com
|