Home


Re: ... rage at Proposition 8 Posted on: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:03:01 +0000 (UTC)

On Nov 9, 8:47=A0pm, Michael Ejercito wrote:
> On Nov 9, 12:39=A0pm, Enos Penvy wrote:
>
> > On Nov 8, 8:28=A0pm, Michael Ejercito wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 8, 11:53=A0am, Guillaume Ier de Normandie @yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > On Nov 8, 12:47=A0pm, Raleigh wrote:
>
> > > > > The ... rights folks are just another nasty little interest group=
that
> > > > > puts its desires about what is good for the country
>
> > > > Do tell. =A0We'd like to know how two men getting married is going =
to be
> > > > bad for the country.
>
> > > =A0 =A0It is an offense to society, and odious to this nation.
>
> > > =A0Michael
>
> > How so?
>
> =A0 =A0Deviation from real marriage is an offense to society, as the U.S.
> Supreme Court decreed in Reynolds vs. the United States.

Society has changed.
2104015. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104016. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104017. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104018. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104019. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104020. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104021. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104022. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104023. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104024. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104025. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104026. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104027. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104028. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104029. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104030. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104031. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104032. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104033. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8
2104034. Re: ... rage at Proposition 8