On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 16:28:00 -0800, Emerson Wainwright wrote:
> On Nov 9, 6:22 pm, strabo wrote:
>> clouddreamer wrote:
>> > Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> >> Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
>> >>> On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 05:52:30 +0000, Californians With Common Sense
>> >>> wrote:
>>
>> >>> Proposition 8 is irrelevant. No law trumps the 14th Amendment.
>>
>> >> No one suggests it does. The Equal Protection clause is not being
>> >> violated. The state may set the rules for, and define, marriage. As
>> >> long as those rules apply equally to everyone, regardless of any
>> >> self-imagined membership in some class, no equal protection violation
>> >> occurs.
>>
>> > But those rules do not apply equally to everyone. People are being
>> > excluded.
>>
>> There are males and there are females.
>
> Are there also homo.uals and hetero.uals?
>
>> Both are treated equally under
>> the law.
>
> Are the homo.uals being treated as equals to the hetero.uals?
No, they aren't and that's an intolerable moral outrage.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now it's time for War Crime Trials at the Hague for Bush/Cheney
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
>>>> at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<<
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
|
