Home


Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse Posted on: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 11:22:10 -0700

No One wrote:
> Anonymous Remailer writes:
>
>> http://townhall.com/columnists/FrankTurek/2008/11/01/born_..._or
>> _a_..._basher_no_excuse?page=full
>>
>>
>> This “born that way” argument is fueling the case for same-.
>> marriage in California. Is it a good argument?
>
> Yes, it is a good argument - studies comparing identical to
> fraternal twins show that there is a substantial genetic component
> that determines one's .ual orientation, and most psychologists
> believe that it is set very early in life (prenatal chemistry
> may be involved as well).

Only those psychologists who want to be PC and continue to work among
homos and sell books believe queers are born not made.
Of course there are the queer psychologists who also sell that nonsense.
2103826. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103827. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103828. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103829. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103830. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103831. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103832. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103833. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103834. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103835. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103836. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103837. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103838. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103839. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103840. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103841. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103842. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103843. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103844. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse
2103845. Re: Born ... or a ... Basher? No Excuse