In article <87fxm2p4i3.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>
No One wrote:
>
> Guillaume Ier de Normandie writes:
>
> > On Nov 8, 2:03 am, Timothy Crowley
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Re: Proposition 8: no violation of Equal Protection clause
> >
> > The Equal Protection clause has not, so far as I've seen, been brought
> > up in this matter.
>
> That's because of a strategic decision to keep the argument in state
> court - we have a very conservative U.S. Supreme Court right now and
> people didn't want to risk letting it set a bad precedent.
Bad precedent by banning homo.ual behavior? Most people would
look upon that as good.
> For general discussions, it is reasonable to bring up the 14th
> Amendment.
Even more reasonable to bring up mental health treatment for
homo.uals since they're all in need of it.
Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it
|
