On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:06:39 -0800, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
>On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 20:32:15 +0000, br549 wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 10:51:26 -0800, Curly Surmudgeon
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:03:02 +0000, br549 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:19:26 -0800, Curly Surmudgeon
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 04:39:36 +0000, br549 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:34:21 -0800, Dan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>br549@pobox.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:07:31 -0800, Dan
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In misc.survivalism tankfixer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Because they can better afford it.
>>>>>>>>>>> How is that "fair" ?
>>>>>>>>>> Because nobody should have to shoulder a larger burden than
>>>>>>>>>> anyone else. The graduated income tax was signedinto law by Teddy
>>>>>>>>>> Roosevelt.
>>>>>>>>>> It is a concept endorsed by Adam Smith.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your sense of fairness differs 180 degreesfrom the traditional
>>>>>>>>>> conservative Republican view.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It violates the "equal protection under the law" concept in the
>>>>>>>>>>> constitution.
>>>>>>>>>> Nope. That has been litigated, and has been not found to be the
>>>>>>>>>> case.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is "fair" because the biggest benfitters of the system pay the
>>>>>>>>> heaviest freight for that system. The cost is minor, compared
>>>>>>>>> with the benefits received.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> God, what a parasite!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I dare say I've paid more taxes than you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I rather doubt that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Proves, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the Republican system of
>>>>>>>>> merit (more money = better person) does not hold true, as these
>>>>>>>>> people cannot even determine value.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And how many corporate 500 companies have you run, loser?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Huh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Exactly, loser.
>>>>>
>>>>>Amazing. Obama won, your head exploded and still you are able to post
>>>>>on usenet. I've read of experiments on cockroaches where the head
>>>>>would be surgically amputated and they can live another month or more.
>>>>>
>>>>>Now, I'll have to keep tabs on your whereabouts to rate your longevity
>>>>>in comparison to cockroaches.
>>>>
>>>> Please don't presume to judge your betters by your own mental
>>>> instability, left wing parasite.
>>>
>>>Bad hangover, eh?
>>
>> No. Long two days. I was up at Vya waiting to see if a couple of your
>> fellow limp-wristers had the cojones to back their big mouths.
>>
>> They didn't -- as usual.
>
>However I do and you've failed to accept my challenge, coward. I'm
>willing to put up hard cash in the absolutely fair and impartial wager
>offered in another thread. Any amount you're capable of losing, let's go
>for it.
>
>Do you have the balls?
More bullshit from the proven liar and moron.,
You're just another lying sack of shit with a big mouth and no spine.
Run along, nutless wonder. |
