On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:30:07 -0400, love you long time!
wrote:
:>On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:26:21 -0400, Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>
:>> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:31:22 -0400, love you long time!
:>> wrote:
:>>
:>>:>On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:16:33 -0400, Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>>:>
:>>:>> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:30:58 -0700, Wyle Coyote
:>>:>> wrote:
:>>:>>
:>>:>>
:>>:>> I appreciate when anyone holds the door for me as I will hold the door
:>>:>> for men and women, especially older adults and anyone with any
:>>:>> physical limitations. It's called manners and being kind and civil to
:>>:>> other people. I don't happen to think it's necessarily gender
:>>:>> related. My husband opens the doors for me as do my three grown
:>>:>> sons. I don't feel it's an entitlement it's just how we were brought
:>>:>> up to respect others.
:>>:>
:>>:>
:>>:>
:>>:>If a man is taught to hold a door for a woman, but not a man, thats every
:>>:>bit as .ist as women complaining about being descriminated against for
:>>:>whatever reason. Its chivalry.
:>>:>
:>>:>Typical of women who complain about this sort of thing, they want to keep
:>>:>all those traditions where they are given preferential treatment....
:>>
:>> You've misunderstood and misinterpreted what I said.....
:>
:>
:>perhaps. however, any woman who thinks she deserves chivalric behavior,
:>such as the age old "you hold a door for a woman", "ladies first" and all
:>that sort of thing, but men do not deserve the same treatment, is a .ist.
Has anyone here said otherwise? You keep beating the wrong bush.
:>Whats funny about all the screaming about descrimination, you never hear
:>women demanding the chivalric practices cease immediately. Because it
:>benefits them.
Who's screaming about discrimination? You're desperately trying to
stir that pot. |
