On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:40:37 GMT, David Johnston
puked:
>On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:18:53 GMT, "lab~rat >:-)"
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:46:31 GMT, David Johnston
>>puked:
>>
>>>On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:18:28 GMT, "lab~rat >:-)"
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:09:24 GMT, David Johnston
>>>>puked:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:38:56 GMT, "lab~rat >:-)"
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:23:25 GMT, David Johnston
>>>>>>puked:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:28:28 GMT, "lab~rat >:-)"
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:32:34 -0400, Dionisio
>>>>>>>> puked:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>lab~rat >:-) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Of course, not only are homo.uals a smaller set of the entire human
>>>>>>>>>> population, but a smaller percentage of homo.uals get married than
>>>>>>>>>> hetero.uals. Even then, in many cases those marriages aren't
>>>>>>>>>> recognized legally, so they can't be accounted for, leaving you with a
>>>>>>>>>> big hole in your statistics.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Speaking of stats... If they can't be accounted for, then how do you know that
>>>>>>>>>...s get married less often?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Because there are less ...s.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That's pretty meaningless.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Are you doing this on purpose or are you just a little slow? If there
>>>>>>are less ...s than straights, which is a given, who do you think gets
>>>>>>married the most?
>>>>>
>>>>>The two things are unrelated in any meaningful way.
>>>>
>>>>What's the answer to the question?
>>>
>>>I don't know the answer to the question of who is, per capita, more
>>>likely to get to get married, and I don't care about the other
>>>question.
>>
>>Per capita? Or percentage wise? I was talking sheer volume
>
>And, as I said, that's meaningless.
>
>and the
>>answer is straight people. You changed my question.
>
>No, I said it's unimportant. Meaningless. Trivial. Not worth
>discussing.
It spawned from a discussion of who gets more divorces, so I guess you
are conceding your point and are ready to move on. Which is a good
idea.
--
lab~rat >:-)
Stupid humans... |
