On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:26:21 -0400, Sarah Czepiel wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:31:22 -0400, love you long time!
> wrote:
>
>:>On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:16:33 -0400, Sarah Czepiel wrote:
>:>
>:>> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:30:58 -0700, Wyle Coyote
>:>> wrote:
>:>>
>:>>
>:>> I appreciate when anyone holds the door for me as I will hold the door
>:>> for men and women, especially older adults and anyone with any
>:>> physical limitations. It's called manners and being kind and civil to
>:>> other people. I don't happen to think it's necessarily gender
>:>> related. My husband opens the doors for me as do my three grown
>:>> sons. I don't feel it's an entitlement it's just how we were brought
>:>> up to respect others.
>:>
>:>
>:>
>:>If a man is taught to hold a door for a woman, but not a man, thats every
>:>bit as .ist as women complaining about being descriminated against for
>:>whatever reason. Its chivalry.
>:>
>:>Typical of women who complain about this sort of thing, they want to keep
>:>all those traditions where they are given preferential treatment....
>
> You've misunderstood and misinterpreted what I said.....
perhaps. however, any woman who thinks she deserves chivalric behavior,
such as the age old "you hold a door for a woman", "ladies first" and all
that sort of thing, but men do not deserve the same treatment, is a .ist.
Whats funny about all the screaming about descrimination, you never hear
women demanding the chivalric practices cease immediately. Because it
benefits them.
|
