On 17 Jul 2007 09:22:54 -0700, No One
puked:
>"lab~rat >:-)" writes:
>
>> On 17 Jul 2007 06:49:24 -0700, No One
>> puked:
>>
>> >"lab~rat >:-)" writes:
>> >
>> >> On 16 Jul 2007 17:10:59 -0700, No One
>> >> puked:
>> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> And the law is good and the law is just and no one should question the
>> >> >> law for the law is the law...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >You basically asked if there was a law saying X, I gave an example of
>> >> >a law saying X, and now you complain at the suggestion that businesses
>> >> >should obey laws.
>> >>
>> >> It's called leading a discussion. You cited a law that was
>> >> discriminatory against business. I think you like government to tell
>> >> people what to do...
>> >
>> >I told you what the law is.
>>
>> And I phrased my question in a manner that an intelligent person would
>> realize was rhetorical. It is painfully obvious that it should be
>> correct and allowable for a business to only hire people that they
>> feel correctly represent their company.
>>
>>
>> > Complaining when people give you the
>> >facts is not "leading a discussion", something you are completely
>> >incapable of doing.
>>
>> Complaining about the facts is what I did in my original statement,
>> but it was so cleverly worded, you felt compelled to prove something,
>> yet others that were a little brighter would read it and say, "Ya
>> know, there's that law, but the dude has a point...".
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >> >If you don't like the laws, you might consider trying to elect
>> >> >someone who will do what you want.
>> >>
>> >> Don't think that those ideas aren't a part of my voting process. I
>> >> would never vote for someone that runs on a platform to further
>> >> restrict small businesses.
>> >
>> >You might consider moving to a country that is even less democratic
>> >than the U.S. is right now.
>>
>> I consider laws dictating how private business conducts personnel
>> issues to be a lot less Democratic and more Nazi-like. But if you
>> enjoy government in every aspect of your life, then you would be happy
>> with that kind of thing.
>
>So, you ask whether there is a law, I give you a reference showing
>that there is such a law, and then you start making silly accusations
>about me for telling you the facts. If you don't like the laws here
>(and these ones, unlike Bush's justification for his concentration
>camp, were enacted via a democratic process), then move somewhere
>else or maybe (gasp) start making campaign contributions to get
>people you like elected.
Why do you think the ...s get so excited at the prospect of a business
owner that thinks the way that I do? Do you think I'm the only one
out there that thinks this way? Affirmative action has taken a big
hit, and trust me, any law requiring businesses to hire ...s will as
well. It's unAmerican to dictate these types of things.
>
>Lab~rat, you are a complete and utter idiot.
I'm smarter than you. You're playing checkers on my chessboard.
--
lab~rat >:-)
Stupid humans... |
