On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:10:42 GMT, David Johnston
puked:
>On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:53:28 GMT, "lab~rat >:-)"
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:52:47 GMT, David Johnston
>>puked:
>>
>>>On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:06:35 GMT, "lab~rat >:-)"
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:57:09 GMT, David Johnston
>>>>puked:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:31:45 GMT, "lab~rat >:-)"
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:26:52 GMT, David Johnston
>>>>>>puked:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:09:04 GMT, "lab~rat >:-)"
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Go ahead. Put your actions where your mouth is.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I think that most of the people in this country should be medically
>>>>>>>>altered so they can't have children.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you want to put an end to your country?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Did I say that?
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes. Or didn't you think about the consequences of sterilising most
>>>>>of the population?
>>>>
>>>>Sure I did. I think it would reel back the social services for people
>>>>that are breeding with impunity and illegal aliens reproducing to
>>>>stake a claim in America. There are too many people in this country
>>>>as it is, and reducing the number would make America BETTER, not bring
>>>>it to an end.
>>>>
>>>>Make sense?
>>>
>>>No. Once you've sterilised most of the population, the population of
>>>the United States in the next couple of generations would plummet to
>>>below that of Canada. You'd be outnumbered by the yearly influx of
>>>Mexicans.
>>
>>Clearly the illegal issue is something that needs to be dealt with
>>before the forced sterilization issue.
>
>Once your population was down below a couple of millions none of the
>means of "dealing" with illegal immigration would still work.
Who said anything about getting the population down to a couple of
millions? And who said that the illegal immigrants wouldn't be a part
of the program?
--
lab~rat >:-)
Stupid humans... |
