Home


Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King Posted on: Sat, 26 May 2007 18:35:11 -0500


"Pinku-Sensei" wrote in message
news:Xns993CA85F63863pinkusenseinetcabalc@204.153.245.131...
> Peter J Ross wrote in
> news:slrnf5buc1.9tu.pjr@pjr.gotdns.org:
>
> > In alt.usenet.kooks on Wed, 23 May 2007 12:44:16 -0400, Roofshadow
> > wrote:
> >
> >> In article <1179898771.584677.155230@q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> >> Aggie wrote:
>
> >>> Please try not to pay attention to an "attribution" at the top of a
> >>> message unless I expressly write that I am quoting you.
> >>
> >> LMAO!
> >
> > I'm beginning to think that CNotM is a possibility,
>
> Oh, she's a definite possibility. I find it more than slightly ironic
> that the content of her conspiracy theory may not be kooky enough, but
> the way she insists on being clue-resistant to how to respond to others
> on USENET certainly might be.
>
> > though PSMHL&S can't be ruled out yet.
>
> It's not a bad troll, but she'd have to admit that she's trolling. Ten
> quatloos says she won't.
>
> >>> Open question: where did the secret documents concerning Edward and
> >>> Wallis Simpson, which were recently released, lay for all these
> >>> years? How was this portion of Council meetings recorded in the
> >>> public minutes?
> >>
> >> Who cares?
> >
> > That's two of us who don't give a damn so far. Any others?
>
> I'm going to see if anyone gives a damn

Kimberly laying the Rubber-Root to Pinkie's ass:

http://www.ztgphosting.com/_w/sfg/004sfg_g180_3595.jpg

Has Kimberly ordered her Sissy-Slave Pinkie to get castrated yet?

1884408. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884409. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884410. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884411. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884412. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884413. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884414. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884415. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884416. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884417. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884418. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884419. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884420. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884421. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884422. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884423. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884424. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884425. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884426. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884427. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King