Home


Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King Posted on: Sat, 26 May 2007 18:34:34 -0500


"Pinku-Sensei" wrote in message
news:Xns993CB3BC6DFACpinkusenseinetcabalc@204.153.245.131...
> Roofshadow wrote in
> news:Roofshadow2004-BED696.12362123052007@comcast.dca.giganews.com:
>
> > In article ,
> > "Pinku-Sensei" wrote:
>
> >> http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/netiquettenazi.htm
> >>
> >> "Netiquette Nazi is in control and does not tolerate back talk,
> >> especially from a sniveling worm like you. She demands the strictest
> >> adherence forum protocols and rules of engagement . If you deviate in
> >> the slightest you WILL be punished. Even Admin is careful not to
> >> attract her ire."
> >
> > LOL!
> >
> > How dare we poke fun and laugh at Aggie'd k00ky ways?
>
> Or swear and argue in "her" thread.

Kimberly laying the Rubber-Root to Pinkie's:

http://www.ztgphosting.com/_w/sfg/004sfg_g180_3595.jpg

Has Kimberly ordered her Sissy-Slave Pinkie to get castrated yet?

HJ

1884408. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884409. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884410. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884411. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884412. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884413. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884414. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884415. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884416. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884417. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884418. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884419. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884420. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884421. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884422. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884423. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884424. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884425. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884426. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King
1884427. Re: Tom Parker Bowles May Be King